The Resident Evil 4 Remake Deserves Praise

Unless you’ve been living under a rock you’ll know that Capcom has finally released the remake of arguably its biggest title ever; Resident Evil 4. The original was released in 2005 to near-universal acclaim, introducing the world to the now standard over-the-shoulder camera. Yes, the original perhaps hasn’t aged as well as you remember, with a few low points here and there, but it still holds up remarkably well.

The remake is now live and is easily the best remake of an original game in history. Sticking close to the original but making tweaks where necessary, the game is proof positive that developers do still love games. More to the point, the Resident Evil 4 remake proves that when companies want to, they can knock it out of the park.

Do We Need Remakes?

Some reviewers are arguing that Resident Evil 4 didn’t need a remake. They say that the game isn’t old enough to need tweaks and that gamers could simply just go back and play the original. But this viewpoint is missing the reality of a game that came out in 2005.

Go back and play the original Resident Evil 4 now and you’ll soon come to realise something undeniable; the original isn’t as good as you remember. Yes, it’s still a good game, but there has been a lot of improvement to general gaming in 20 years. Check out the cutting-edge games available on a site like Luck Land Casino, all of which are accessible on the average phone, and remember that none of this was possible in 2005. That’s how far we’ve come.

The original Resident Evil 4 has clunky controls, does not allow Leon to walk while he’s shooting, and many sections of the game are based around Quick Time Events (QTEs.) You might have forgotten, but remember now that QTEs were a big thing back in 2005. Today, pressing buttons to advance a cut scene is no longer seen as cutting edge.

A Love Letter To The Original

Keep in mind that the Resident Evil 4 Remake is a completely new game, recreating the original from the ground up, and you start to understand just how much work went into the project. More to the point, the developers understood what made the original great while also knowing where to make improvements. The truth is that those who feel a remake wasn’t necessary are most likely simply lost in a cloud of nostalgia.

The reality is that most of us tend to fondly remember things from our childhood. But as far as technology is concerned, products made more than two decades ago are probably obsolete. We may remember tech from 20 years ago as perfect, but the truth is it was only perfect for the time. Hence, the Resident Evil 4 Remake isn’t really a remake at all, it’s more of an upgrade.

The Last Of Us Remake, on the other hand, is another story. A computer game from 2013 probably really didn’t need a remake at all. A patch would likely have been more than enough.